Global Horror Studies: Linking J-Horror to Asia 等下九點有第二場panel。等一下，我看錯時間，是晚上九點。台灣明天早上九點。 "Bodies Without Memory: The Philosophical Zombie in Kiyoshi Kurosawa's Cure" Cosmopolitan Animisms: Disambiguating “Asian Horror” 黑澤清和殭屍意象？！
Tuesday, October 5, 7pm (Q&A): "Expanding the Horror Canon: Exploring Queer Horror with Eric LaRocca and Hailey Piper": zoom link Wednesday, October 6, 11am (performance/talk): Discoteca Flaming Star, “The Flesh is the Zombie”: zoom link
‘Squid Game’ Director Hwang Dong-hyuk on Netflix’s Hit Korean Series and Prospects for a Sequel 這部的意象很明確，黃東赫本身的立場也挺清楚的。不過感覺很多細節是架構在韓國社會背景上。性別、南北韓關係加冷戰創傷、工運歷史和國族建構都挺有趣的。很喜歡這部裡韓國警察就算介入遊戲也自動選擇處刑者那方這點XDDD
然後前陣子英國Sarah Everard被殺再次激起的 Reclaim the Night遊行，當年就是因為1970末到1980初警察「保護」約克郡女性的方式是女性宵禁，要求女性太陽下山就全部待在家才誕生的，好嗎？當時警方/社會認為女性不要出沒公共空間，就不會被殺被強暴，這也是「合理性別區隔以確保婦女孩童安全」啊。我已經完全不懂跨性別換證案連署的要求是什麼，現在推這種東西是要把女性關回去西方十九世紀「女性」定義嗎？傻眼欸。(英國女性是很困在他們十九世紀女性定義沒錯啦，但台灣到底跟什麼風？)
這麼想談公共廁所，好啊，來談公共廁所和身體的政治啊。 Introduction: The Politics of the Public Toilet How Inclusion can Exclude: The Case of Public Toilet Provision for Women Toilet Training: The Gender and Sexual Body Politics of the Bathroom
Modern Woman: The Lost Sex 1947年美國暢銷書。社會學家和精神科醫師合寫。內容在描述戰後美國女人因為女性主義都「病」了，試圖用科學證實女人應該待在家庭裡，不應該出去工作。 "Feminism, despite the external validity of its political program and most (not all) of its social program, was at its core, a deep illness."
Men were also pressured into acceptable family roles, since lack of a suitable wife could mean the loss of a job or promotion for a middle-class man. Bachelors were categorized as "immature," "infantile," "narcissistic," "deviant," or even "pathological."
Family advice expert Paul Landis argued: "Except for the sick, the badly crippled, the deformed, the emotionally warped and the mentally defective, almost everyone has an opportunity [and, by clear implication, a duty] to marry." 救命我看incel的想法也是練蠱練出來的啊。
"What I hope for you, for all my sisters and daughters, brothers and sons, is that you will be able to live there, in the dark place. To live in the place that our rationalizing culture of success denies, calling it a place of exile, uninhabitable, foreign.
Well, we’re already foreigners. Women as women are largely excluded from, alien to, the self-declared male norms of this society, where human beings are called Man, the only respectable god is male, the only direction is up. So that’s their country; let’s explore our own.
I’m not talking about sex; that’s a whole other universe, where every man and woman is on their own. I’m talking about society, the so-called man’s world of institutionalized competition, aggression, violence, authority, and power. If we want to live as women, some separatism is forced upon us: Mills College is a wise embodiment of that separatism.
The war-games world wasn’t made by us or for us; we can’t even breathe the air there without masks. And if you put the mask on you’ll have a hard time getting it off. So how about going on doing things our own way, as to some extent you did here at Mills?
Not for men and the male power hierarchy — that’s their game. Not against men, either — that’s still playing by their rules. But with any men who are with us: that’s our game. Why should a free woman with a college education either fight Machoman or serve him? Why should she live her life on his terms?
In our society, women have lived, and have been despised for living, the whole side of life that includes and takes responsibility for helplessness, weakness, and illness, for the irrational and the irreparable, for all that is obscure, passive, uncontrolled, animal, unclean — the valley of the shadow, the deep, the depths of life.
All that the Warrior denies and refuses is left to us and the men who share it with us and therefore, like us, can’t play doctor, only nurse, can’t be warriors, only civilians, can’t be chiefs, only indians. Well so that is our country. The night side of our country.
If there is a day side to it, high sierras, prairies of bright grass, we only know pioneers’ tales about it, we haven’t got there yet. We’re never going to get there by imitating Machoman. We are only going to get there by going our own way, by living there, by living through the night in our own country.
So what I hope for you is that you live there not as prisoners, ashamed of being women, consenting captives of a psychopathic social system, but as natives. That you will be at home there, keep house there, be your own mistress, with a room of your own.
That you will do your work there, whatever you’re good at, art or science or tech or running a company or sweeping under the beds, and when they tell you that it’s second-class work because a woman is doing it, I hope you tell them to go to hell and while they’re going to give you equal pay for equal time.
I hope you live without the need to dominate, and without the need to be dominated. I hope you are never victims, but I hope you have no power over other people.
And when you fail, and are defeated, and in pain, and in the dark, then I hope you will remember that darkness is your country, where you live, where no wars are fought and no wars are won, but where the future is. Our roots are in the dark; the earth is our country.
Why did we look up for blessing — instead of around, and down? What hope we have lies there. Not in the sky full of orbiting spy-eyes and weaponry, but in the earth we have looked down upon. Not from above, but from below.
"In the dust where my heart will remain each night and every day until you understand what I know and long to tell you: to be given dominion over another is a hard thing; to wrest dominion over another is a wrong thing; to give dominion of yourself to another is a wicked thing."
"To a biologist, heritability refers to the passage of traits or tendencies along family lines as a result of genetic transmission. It says little about the range of environmental modification to which theses traits are subject. In our vernacular, 'inherited' often means 'inevitable.' But not to a biologist.
Genes do not make specific bits and pieces of a body; they code for a range of forms under an array of environment conditions. Moreover, even when a trait has been built and set, environmental intervention may still modify inherited defects."
"It was in this philosophical atmosphere that the Supreme Court heard one of the landmark cases of U.S. history, the Dred Scott v. Sanford. Dred Scott and his wife claimed freedom on the basis that they had resided in a free state and were therefore now free persons.
The Supreme Court ruled that Scott could not bring a suit in federal court because Black people were not citizens in the eyes of the U.S. Constitution. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney also ruled that slaves were property based on the Constitution, and therefore owners could not be deprived of their property.
Ultimately, Taney declared with the full force of law that to be black in America was to be an 'inferior being' with 'no rights' which the white man was bound to respect,' and that slavery was for his benefit. .
Taney used the racist logic of black inferiority that saturated American culture of the time to argue that African descents were of another 'unfit' race, and therefore improved by the condition of slavery. "
Caste, Class, and Race: A Study in Social Dynamics 越讀越喜歡Butler的Patternist系列了，那個真的是用科幻元素把啟蒙時代到當代生物學和心理學怎麼區辨種族和性別的發展重寫一遍，然後回頭問讀者「種族」是什麼？「性別」是什麼？在這樣的社會裡「階級」「種族」和「性別」難道有辦法區分？
Southlake, Texas, schools restrict classroom libraries after backlash over anti-racist book 美國新聞就是鏘。起火點是家長向學校抗議小孩的老師在教室書櫃擺Tiffany Jewell的This Book Is Anti-Racist，學校因此打算懲戒老師。新聞報出來之後，學校發文表示他們沒有要求老師把書從書櫃裡拿走，他們只是公布了一個表格。 對，這就是美式作風。學校/高層的解釋權大到他們只要想要就可以搞死你。
seemingly simple questions that can’t possibly be answered to either your satisfaction or your interlocutor’s because their ignorance of concepts vital to whatever you might say is so lacking, so fundamentally incorrect, that there’s no way to answer the first point without first explaining eight other things in detail.
There are layers to what’s being misunderstood, to what’s missing from the conversation, and unless you’ve got the time and inclination to dig down to the onion-core of where your perspectives ultimately diverge, there’s precious little chance of the conversation progressing peacefully.
After all, if your interlocutor thinks they’ve asked a reasonable, easy question, your inability to answer it plainly is likely to make them think they’ve scored a point.
It’s like a cocky first-year student asking a 101 question and feeling smug when their professor can’t condense the four years of study needed to understand why it’s a 101 question into a three-sentence answer.
The problem is one as much of attitude as ignorance: having anticipated a quick response, your interlocutor has to be both willing and interested enough to want to hear what might, at least initially, sound like an explanation of a wholly unrelated issue
等下九點有第二場panel。等一下，我看錯時間，是晚上九點。台灣明天早上九點。"Bodies Without Memory: The Philosophical Zombie in Kiyoshi Kurosawa's Cure"
Cosmopolitan Animisms: Disambiguating “Asian Horror”
黑澤清和殭屍意象？！
這部似乎連預告片都沒有。不知道之後有沒有機會在Shudder上看到。
Whaaaaa? XDDDD
Monday, October 4, 12pm (talk): Patricia MacCormack, "Never Alive, Already Dead: Queer Death Identity in Horror": zoom link
Wednesday, October 6, 11am (performance/talk): Discoteca Flaming Star, “The Flesh is the Zombie”: zoom link
室友：(韓文)
我：你是說「先見之明」嗎？
室友：！！！
發現先見之明用台語發音聽起來和韓文有像。
到107看完了。新自由主義已經明顯到不是隱喻。
這部的意象很明確，黃東赫本身的立場也挺清楚的。不過感覺很多細節是架構在韓國社會背景上。性別、南北韓關係加冷戰創傷、工運歷史和國族建構都挺有趣的。很喜歡這部裡韓國警察就算介入遊戲也自動選擇處刑者那方這點XDDD
又是女性和兒童安全，到底要多以「女性和兒童安全」為名？(白眼)
拜託，英美歷史上超多「保障女性和兒童安全」為出發點的立法最後都害慘社會弱勢中弱勢......
Child savers
Social purity movement
社會厭女，兇手厭女，負責抓兇手的也厭女。
這真的沒問題？這些人提議用法律的方式？用警察的方式？
Introduction: The Politics of the Public Toilet
How Inclusion can Exclude: The Case of Public Toilet Provision for Women
Toilet Training: The Gender and Sexual Body Politics of the Bathroom
Ladies and Gents: Public Toilets and Gender
(但到法庭上好相反，十九世紀因為精神病學的發展「大腦有疾病於是衍生出殺人行為」的人可能不會被判死刑，但十八世紀以前他們只要犯罪就是死刑。)
這本從啟蒙時代「人類是理性的」中心思想一路談到西方十九世紀家庭為什麼有男主「外」女主「內」架構，以及「愛」是怎麼成為婚姻裡面連結「男」「女」和他們社會刻板形象的部份好好看。
1947年美國暢銷書。社會學家和精神科醫師合寫。內容在描述戰後美國女人因為女性主義都「病」了，試圖用科學證實女人應該待在家庭裡，不應該出去工作。
"Feminism, despite the external validity of its political program and most (not all) of its social program, was at its core, a deep illness."
救命我看incel的想法也是練蠱練出來的啊。
電影Jennifer’s Body的專書！來推薦圖書館買。
繼續說性別和種族無關啊。
So What Exactly Is 'Blood Quantum'?
看了通姦證明終篇大爆哭。
「亞洲志異」類型徵稿。這定義有點......殖民意味。觀察一下。
「一個機會，我想著。這不算保護但至少有所不同。你穿著那雙鞋站在那裡那個很高的人在笑說他可以拿我當抵債品。我知道主人不會答應。我說你。選你，我的女兒。因為我看到很高的人把你當人類小孩，不是八塊錢。我在他前面跪下，希望奇蹟出現。他說好。
這不是奇蹟，不是神的賜予。這是憐憫，是人的出價。我繼續跪著。直到你了解我所知道而且渴望告訴你的事，每個日夜我的心會持續待在那塵土之上：承蒙支配他人的權力是件困難的事；爭奪統治他人的權力是件錯誤的事；給予他人控制你的權力是件邪惡的事。」
(雖然兩邊護的「女」的確是來自同一個年代的同一種概念，但......顧一下後果啊OTZ)
別的小說：主角心裡有不正常慾望，主角殺人！
海史密斯：社會瘋狂監視主角，主角知道自己不正常，為了像個正常人，主角殺人！
via
(那些梗圖......)
Enlightment
BTW以解殖角度出發的確會拆跨性別，但西方男女二元觀也全拆。無法接受台灣目前醫學或法律或科學分的男女不算數？那就不要用，用了只會打臉自己。
What Enlightenment Project?
生物決定論當家欸。
順便來推一下專門研究龐德的學術期刊。
Television’s screens: hegemony in transition
Policing Los Angeles: Race, Resistance, and the Rise of the LAPD
Medical Apartheid: The Dark History of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans from Colonial Times to the Present
Bodies of Tomorrow: Technology, Subjectivity, Science Fiction
Out Of Bedlam: The Truth About Deinstitutionalization
The Folklore of Deinstitutionalization: Popular Film and the Death of the Asylum, 1973–1979
那天和韓國還有菲律賓人聊天，他們看到的點很不一樣。菲律賓同學非常在意影集後半富麗堂皇的房間裡面站著當擺設的人，問了超級細節的問題。
不過我們剛剛討論了一下，最近熱度的確比剛上架還高，有種是上了經濟版面（因為大賺啊、非英語內容之類的討論）之後再燒回娛樂圈的感覺。
我覺得除了不把他們當人看，從警察的那段劇情推測，應該還有他們隨時要提供那些講英文的人性服務的暗示。
Man's Most Dangerous Myth: The Fallacy of Race
Splatoon的笑點是什麼啊(抓不到)
等一下，我又抓不到鱷魚遊戲的點了
但是感覺不同觀眾看到的點都差好多(很多人想到的是日本作品這點也很有趣)！像室友昨天跟我說美國觀眾公認最喜歡的角色是阿里(
好美國文化政治正確的選擇)(嗯，以教育系統一般把政治和科學分科讀的方式當然看不出來。)
越讀越喜歡Butler的Patternist系列了，那個真的是用科幻元素把啟蒙時代到當代生物學和心理學怎麼區辨種族和性別的發展重寫一遍，然後回頭問讀者「種族」是什麼？「性別」是什麼？在這樣的社會裡「階級」「種族」和「性別」難道有辦法區分？
不過我也在和室友討論，台灣社會感覺對女性主義的態度和韓國不太一樣，不知道如果台灣有推行類似政策的話，是不是也會強化社會針對「女性主義」的批評......？
但最近要選舉這點被拿出來炒
法學。看起來這噗噗主對性別的定義應該不是醫學決定性別。(如果這點達不到共識，後面也沒辦法討論。)
政府機關通過性別保護法律時確實在大選時，有男性候選人被拉下時會輿論爆炸，但咱們的女性候選人還滿爭氣，我印象是最近廿年自己打江山後，議員委員那邊也沒有聽過出現爭議聲浪了。反而轉至中央與地方政府的官僚性別被抨擊。但這仗很難打，是因為可能天花板（這邊關係較大的是高階職位非常少），又或者有更好的人生幸福考量（公家機關單位很.....磨人？），幫女性爭權的反而容易吵輸......
原文網址
雖然我覺得她似乎表態支持JK羅琳還是有點阿雜有人回在愛特伍轉貼該文的推特下面了，我補充在這裡：
最最噴飯的評論：为什么整天有人在那玻璃心森七七接梗啊😂，这种看完以后两者配合让整个作品完整了😂
這部冷門到沒有英文字幕只有英文配音的預告。
這季感覺也有碰觸到波蘭被納粹德國佔領期間的歷史。不過因為設定在1997，又加了美國影響。
10/25 台灣時間 8:30–9:30 pm
美國新聞就是鏘。起火點是家長向學校抗議小孩的老師在教室書櫃擺Tiffany Jewell的This Book Is Anti-Racist，學校因此打算懲戒老師。新聞報出來之後，學校發文表示他們沒有要求老師把書從書櫃裡拿走，他們只是公布了一個表格。
對，這就是美式作風。學校/高層的解釋權大到他們只要想要就可以搞死你。
遊風🔪NiCE Z50 : 對......說到演化論突然想到像肯達基州還有Creation Museum，那種完美結合聖經和他們眼中科學的博物館。
(嘆氣) ......對我想對某些人來說這就叫女性主義吧。呃呃呃。
投入感情前：這樣很好可以看看納粹勝利的世界線會長怎樣。
投入感情後：漫畫社你等著我燒死你吧。
寄生上流和魷魚遊戲的討論直播中。
氣溫應該快掉到零度了。
絕對不是腦殘‘There’s a Special Kind of Monster that is a Woman’:
Locating Female Subjectivity in the Narrative of the Monstrous Murderess in Netflix’s Alias Grace
最近森林的鹿又變多了。
在想，如果編劇本來就是用魷魚遊戲的工作人員來暗喻韓國軍事警察在新自由主義社會的角色......那萬聖節有人穿著那套在街上走到底是有多諷刺。