Rather, the language states that physicians are exempt from prosecution if they attempt to reimplant the pregnancy “if applicable.” Because medical science has not yet figured out how to reimplant the pregnancy, it is not applicable. At least not yet.
芬狼@狼谷 白夜
: 我連結的文章裡有解釋 The section would exempt physicians from prosecution for “abortion murder” or “aggravated abortion murder” for actions leading to the death of a fetus if they:
第三點 C) Take[] all possible steps to preserve the life of the unborn child, while preserving the life of the woman. Such steps include, if applicable, attempting to reimplant an ectopic pregnancy into the woman’s uterus.
這裡爭論的地方老實說很像鬼打牆...
不過我大概是有點理解為什麼常有人說兩邊極端派都是同一類人,
只是站的邊不一樣罷了...
胎兒不管多大,只要還沒"生產"都不能算人;
胎兒自受精以來就是人...
我個人是覺得一般人不會這麼極端就是...
他怎麼不說取出來冷凍，術後恢復再植入呢也是台灣人：你看看這些事情有多誇張保守派納粹崛起迫害女人人類要滅亡了啦