Anyway, here’s another tip from the document: 'Tie your campaign to more popular reform.' For example: 'In Ireland, Denmark and Norway, changes to the law on legal gender recognition were put through at the same time as other more popular reforms such as marriage equality legislation.
This provided a veil of protection, particularly in Ireland, where marriage equality was strongly supported, but gender identity remained a more difficult issue to win public support for.'
'Another technique which has been used to great effect is the limitation of press coverage and exposure. In certain countries, like the UK, information on legal gender recognition reforms has been misinterpreted in the mainstream media, and opposition has arisen as a result.
A major international law firm has helped write a lobbying manual for people who want to change the law to prevent parents having the final say about significant changes in the status of their own children.
That manual advises those lobbying for that change to hide their plans behind a 'veil' and to make sure that neither the media nor the wider public know much about the changes affecting children that they are seeking to make. Because if the public find out about those changes, they might well object to them.
In a democracy, we are all free to argue for whatever policy or position we wish. But normally, anyone who wants to change the law accepts that to do so they need to win the support or, at least, the consent of the people whose authority ultimately gives the law its force.
The approach outlined, in detail, in the Dentons report amounts to a very different way of lobbying to get the laws and policies you want. Even more notably, it suggests that in several countries people have been quite successful in lobbying behind a 'veil' and in a way that deliberately avoids the attention of the public.
跨權支持者要求「僅憑自我認定Self ID」就要法律承認他們的性別認同，並且主張跨性別不需要具有性別不安的精神科診斷，一但面對自我認定是跨性別的犯罪者就說他們通通不是跨性別。
比較傳統的跨女會說他們不會隨意裸露身體，不願意使用陰莖性交；新一代的跨女們卻主張他們有權使用裸體的女性設施，例如美國的Wi SPA事件，或是稱他們生殖器官為女性的生殖器官，female penis或是girl dick，並且強烈主張他們的生殖權，如檯面上一份聯署書就強調傳宗接代的責任，還有英美都有大量真實的個案證明自稱的跨女會以陰莖性侵他人。
我並不認為這些人都應該被強迫動手術，但他們不應該進入女性空間。
連署頁面維修恢復了
連署連結：
合理性別區隔
暫緩免術換證
英國跨權團體石牆的倡議策略就是不讓反對的聲音有機會表達，我們不能讓同樣的事情在台灣發生。
For example:
'In Ireland, Denmark and Norway, changes to the law on legal gender recognition were put through at the same time as other more popular reforms such as marriage equality legislation.
比如同婚
可以做為一層保護的面紗
就不會引發反對的聲音
他們在愛爾蘭進行政治遊說的時候就針對個人的政治人物
盡量把媒體報導範圍壓在最小
下面是這篇文章的作者下的結論:
這手冊也建議政治遊說要隱藏他們的計劃在「面紗」之後，確保無論是媒體還是大眾都不知道這些改變會如何影響小孩。因為社會大眾如果知道了，他們可能會拒絕。
性別變更登記相關公開文件專區 | 社團法人台灣性別不明關懷協會
好像變更年齡是十八歲…（裡面有提到像日本那樣需不需要未婚或無未成年小孩的部分，不過是保留待議
他們也知道如果訴求是「為了將來要變性的人」大家都會同情，問題他們的訴求根本是為了不會變性的人