不流汗
衛報的平衡報導,本文的重點是批評IOC的規則造成眼前的這個局面,我是不是可以說這是在拿兩位選手當柴火燒?你要批評篩選標準有問題,卻拿兩個沒有被定論是跨性別、生理男還是間性人的選手當舉例,結果現在網路上燒的是選手,可不是原本報導預設的IOC欸,真是水鏡北七。

In the Olympics boxing arena, facts and fairness are...

然後這也才終於願意承認,目前沒有證據顯示林郁婷以及Imane Khelif有除了女人之外的性別,因為他們生來就是女嬰、也是以女性的身份被養大。
不流汗
Can we just be really clear on this? Lin is not, as far as anyone knows, a transgender woman. Lin is also not male, as far as anyone knows, and has never changed her gender identity.
不流汗
Only one thing is really clear. It is all very hard on Lin and the Algerian boxer Imane Khelif, who had a similar result in a test taken by the IBA. Both boxed without incident in Tokyo. Both have competed for years at this level.
不流汗
Khelif has a similar backstory. She was born and grew up as female. She is not doping, and is not trying to assert a new gender identity.
不流汗
In the end the only obvious fault here lies with the IOC’s malfunctioning boxing unit, which has managed this situation with a ham-fisted and weirdly aggressive sense of its own certainty. It lies with Thomas Bach, who clearly just hoped this would all blow over.
不流汗
It lies with the failure to formulate a proper policy, to have a plan and a programme for the athletes. It lies with every talking head who has half-understood this situation, has assumed that what they are witnessing here is just another variation on previous outrages and leapt in with both feet.
藍色史萊姆FINO㌠
他們就不敢直接冒犯正反雙方啊
N。琉 對不起我幻聽
IOC當鴕鳥當很久了
不流汗
我相信衛報的立場是反對口頭跨性別參加女性賽事啦,這次就是抓著IBA搞出來的事情在見獵心喜,然而事實就是,如果你既不承認IBA的說法,也不認同IOC的標準,那麼就表示你沒有任何其他籌碼可以用來質疑兩人的性別,你就只能相信選手出生國家的性別判定,或者還有多年來其他賽事主辦單位的公信力。

就這麼簡單。
沃夫☆ 自由啊,青鳥咚鹿
趴著不會中槍
球兒—I♥U3000
不流汗 : 衛報應該不只是反對口頭跨性別,衛報也有報導DSD的部分
IOC puts out correction after president Thomas Bach ...
不流汗
球兒—I♥U3000 : 衛報要反對什麼都好,要指控別人是什麼鬼東西,也麻煩提出證據

不過從強尼戴普告輸太陽報來看,法院會認為媒體這樣已經有查證了就是了
球兒—I♥U3000
不流汗 : 衛報沒有指控什麼,它只是在陳述IOC原本說這次爭議不是DSD事件,但「非DSD」是「口誤」,改為這次爭議與跨無關。 https://images.plurk.com/6kbO9SQi9pr4bRHVOB66Yt.jpg
請見IOC官方勾勾推特謝謝
IOC MEDIA (@iocmedia) on X
載入新的回覆