不流汗💸
衛報的平衡報導,本文的重點是批評IOC的規則造成眼前的這個局面,我是不是可以說這是在拿兩位選手當柴火燒?你要批評篩選標準有問題,卻拿兩個沒有被定論是跨性別、生理男還是間性人的選手當舉例,結果現在網路上燒的是選手,可不是原本報導預設的IOC欸,真是水鏡北七。

In the Olympics boxing arena, facts and fairness are...

然後這也才終於願意承認,目前沒有證據顯示林郁婷以及Imane Khelif有除了女人之外的性別,因為他們生來就是女嬰、也是以女性的身份被養大。
不流汗💸
Can we just be really clear on this? Lin is not, as far as anyone knows, a transgender woman. Lin is also not male, as far as anyone knows, and has never changed her gender identity.
不流汗💸
Only one thing is really clear. It is all very hard on Lin and the Algerian boxer Imane Khelif, who had a similar result in a test taken by the IBA. Both boxed without incident in Tokyo. Both have competed for years at this level.
不流汗💸
Khelif has a similar backstory. She was born and grew up as female. She is not doping, and is not trying to assert a new gender identity.
不流汗💸
In the end the only obvious fault here lies with the IOC’s malfunctioning boxing unit, which has managed this situation with a ham-fisted and weirdly aggressive sense of its own certainty. It lies with Thomas Bach, who clearly just hoped this would all blow over.
不流汗💸
It lies with the failure to formulate a proper policy, to have a plan and a programme for the athletes. It lies with every talking head who has half-understood this situation, has assumed that what they are witnessing here is just another variation on previous outrages and leapt in with both feet.
藍色史萊姆FINO㌠
他們就不敢直接冒犯正反雙方啊
N。琉 對不起我幻聽
IOC當鴕鳥當很久了
不流汗💸
我相信衛報的立場是反對口頭跨性別參加女性賽事啦,這次就是抓著IBA搞出來的事情在見獵心喜,然而事實就是,如果你既不承認IBA的說法,也不認同IOC的標準,那麼就表示你沒有任何其他籌碼可以用來質疑兩人的性別,你就只能相信選手出生國家的性別判定,或者還有多年來其他賽事主辦單位的公信力。

就這麼簡單。
沃夫☆罷免KMT保出入平安
趴著不會中槍
球兒—I♥U3000
不流汗💸 : 衛報應該不只是反對口頭跨性別,衛報也有報導DSD的部分
IOC puts out correction after president Thomas Bach ...
不流汗💸
球兒—I♥U3000 : 衛報要反對什麼都好,要指控別人是什麼鬼東西,也麻煩提出證據

不過從強尼戴普告輸太陽報來看,法院會認為媒體這樣已經有查證了就是了
球兒—I♥U3000
不流汗💸 : 衛報沒有指控什麼,它只是在陳述IOC原本說這次爭議不是DSD事件,但「非DSD」是「口誤」,改為這次爭議與跨無關。 https://images.plurk.com/6kbO9SQi9pr4bRHVOB66Yt.jpg
請見IOC官方勾勾推特謝謝
IOC MEDIA (@iocmedia) on X
載入新的回覆