As Kavanaugh noted, the Supreme Court will never come up with a perfect solution. However it rules, there will still be questions about what counts as an undue hardship, since all Title VII cases are context-specific.
What the Supreme Court must decide, then, is whether the “de minimis” language from 1977 is confusing enough to warrant an overhaul of that past decision or if it’s better to issue a simple clarification.
Sveriges Radio said on its blog that Twitter has lost its relevance to Swedish audiences. National Public Radio and Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, meanwhile, have pointed to Twitter’s new policy of labeling them as government-funded instititutions, saying it undermines their credibility.
As Kavanaugh noted, the Supreme Court will never come up with a perfect solution. However it rules, there will still be questions about what counts as an undue hardship, since all Title VII cases are context-specific.What the Supreme Court must decide, then, is whether the “de minimis” language from 1977 is confusing enough to warrant an overhaul of that past decision or if it’s better to issue a simple clarification.