避孕 Griswold v. Connecticut was a landmark 1965 case which ruled the use of contraception between two married individuals was a matter of privacy and constitutionally protected.
同婚 Lawrence v. Texas in 2003 dealt with homosexual sex between consenting parties, and Obergefell v. Hodges treaded the same territory in 2015 to rule gay marriage as a constitutionally protected right to privacy.
這才是現實吧
我們跨運可是和妳們女人站在一起抗議那些保守派，但是你們不能用女人這個無法概括到我們群體的用詞，那是歧視！
看到說反墮胎就膝反射
網路塑造出的都會型生活型態思考模式Griswold v. Connecticut was a landmark 1965 case which ruled the use of contraception between two married individuals was a matter of privacy and constitutionally protected.
Lawrence v. Texas in 2003 dealt with homosexual sex between consenting parties, and Obergefell v. Hodges treaded the same territory in 2015 to rule gay marriage as a constitutionally protected right to privacy.
「不是只是回歸各州嗎?」
「我其實不了解耶, 這種新聞我都跳過」
「那不想了解的話生氣是為什麼?」
「因為訂這法的都是他媽的智障男人!幹!」
「可是反墮胎方的也多半是女人耶」
「不想說了啦, 有夠可悲的呵呵」
他在說跨運嗎