Iris Marion Young在1994年的論文《Gender as Seriality》中提及她對女性主義未來社會運動的走向有如何的見解：

//In summary, then, I propose that using the concept of seriality and its distinction from the concept of a group can help solve the conundrums about talking about women as a group in which feminist theory has recently found itself.//

我直接跳到結語：她認為，與其將「女性」辨識為一種團體，不如說是一種「連續群體」

//Woman is a serial collective defined neither by any common identity nor by a common set of attributes that all the individuals in the series share, but, rather, it names a set of structural constraints and relations to practio-inert objects that condition action and its meaning.//

女性是一群連續群體，並不被共通性或是一組特徵定義所定義——縱使某部分連續群體的個體們可能擁有他們。女性是與各種社會結構限制和惰性實踐產生關係，這些關係使其行動並賦予意義。

//I am inclined to say that the series includes all female human beings in the world, and others of the past, but how and where we draw the historical lines is an open question. We can also claim that there are also social and historical subseries.//

我傾向於認為這個連續系列包含了所有時空內的女性，但歷史上的分界如何劃定是個開放的問題，我們也可以說或許還有歷史上或社會上的子分類

//Since the series is not a concept but a more practical-material mode of the social construction of individuals, one need not think of it in terms of genus and species, but as vectors of action and meaning.//

因為這個連續系列並不是一個概念，更像是個人在社會上的物質性和實踐性產生的模式，我們不需要屬於什麼「種類」的概念，而是要從我們的行動和其產生的意義來去思考（什麼是女性）

//Unlike most groups of women, feminist groups take something about women's condition as the explicit aim of their action, and thus feminist groups at least implicitly refer to the series of women that lies beyond the group. Feminist politics and theory refers to or gestures toward this serial reality.//

與大多數女性群體不同，女性主義群體將女性身處的狀況當作是他們行動的明確目標，也因此女性主義群體些許隱含了某系列的女性處於女性這個群體之外（beyond），女性主義政治和理論指向或走向這個連續體身處的現實。