Mad Larkin
[environment] ok the stupidest comment on the internet has been said, everyone can go home now
Mad Larkin
(I'm sure there's stupider out there, but this is the stupidest I've seen here)
Mad Larkin
"the environment exists to provide us with resources to live our lives"
Mad Larkin
this is... sensible? somehow?
فك يو
(unsure)
Kira🌵
honestly I'm not fond of either of these arguments; the first one is very "poor people having children is the biggest problem for the environment," which... no?
and the second is just willful denial of the concept of scarcity
Luke Skywanker
This is a very Christian dominionist view of the environment. The environment doesn't have a purpose, but if it was created by God to provide for humanity, then it "makes sense" that it'll just keep doing so!
Mad Larkin
Kira🌵 I don't think either argument is right, either, but the complete baldfaced "the world is build for us" is the tip of a worse iceberg, imo
Mad Larkin
Luke Skywanker yeah, it's very dominionist, which I hate
Luke Skywanker
I prefer the Christian stewardship model
Luke Skywanker
not that I have a say I'm a filthy atheist
Mad Larkin
that model at least acknowledges that we can't do whatever we want and expect things to magically stay fine
Luke Skywanker
Yes. I find it rather inspiring, actually.
載入新的回覆