這篇分析評論的觀點是談判至少還會花一兩年的時間，If Europeans wish to push back against Article 11 and Article 13, they need to prepare to radically change copyright law, including an overall rethinking of its foundations and approach. Nothing like that, however, seems to lie on the horizon at the moment.
The next steps will be in fact a discussion of the text of the directive, which, once adopted, will need to be implemented by individual EU countries within a time frame that is usually two years. So … gather ye memes while you may.
而且看完蜻蜓計畫後，這個法案後面是真的沒有任何政府財團撐腰嗎？(個人認為這個法案本身就算利益了，可以觀看任何人在平台上傳的東西...這些數據本身就可以賣錢了，個人覺得
萬惡的JASRAC一樣，到最後收的錢絕大多數都進了自己口袋變成人事費，連創作者自己要引用自己的作品都得先付他們錢，然後JASRAC根本沒給創作者多少收入XD新聞的狀況雖然少人點連結去看，但如果使用新聞連結或是引用裡面的詞語會犯法，真的會滋養假新聞跟假消息的流通成效，畢竟假的不用查
好吧！說背後沒有利益我是不信的，不好意思一直找噗主聊天
條文我是看這個 http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef...