我真的不是故意的，只是找文獻哪知道AI又直接給我答案了

Is Psychoanalysis a pseudoscience?

這串比較炸

https://iaap.org/... 幫分析說句話

其實裡面有幾篇有看過，只能說，咳咳

現在是醫療經濟學當道的年代，砸同樣大錢，大部分應該會選醫美，去聽你話唬爛幹嘛。如果英國公費Tavistock倒了，精神分析這門玄學就剩法國扛了。

炸裂言論精選：

It will literally disassemble you and then put you back together again. It takes a very long time, has no guaranties, and is usually not covered by insurance and is very expensive.

Caveat Emptor- There are many “Psychoanalytic Psychotherapists” out there who are actually not propoperly trained in Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy.

Dont go looking for Psychoanalysis if you cant afford it. The modality that you go with is the one suggested to you by qualified professionals, based on testing and interviews, and of course your pocket book and your insurance.

Freud more so then Marx damaged psychology and psychoanalytic theory for decades !!!!

In Popper's example, the actions of a man who pushed a child into a river, and a man who dived in to save a drowning child were, like all human behaviour, equally open to Freudian explanation. Whether someone tried to drown or save a child, Freud's theory could explain it.

He would probably say that the first man was repressing some aspect of his Oedipal conflict, and that led to his violent behaviour, whereas the second man had ‘sublimated’ his unconscious desires, that is, managed to steer them into socially useful actions.

佛洛伊德不愧是嘴砲祖師

psychoanalysis is fake science un par with astrology, global warming, phrenology, communist ideals on race

today's mainstream psychiatry and psychology that has created a pseudoscientific ethos with jargon terms. The ludicrous ever expanding DSM is witness to that. Of course, it's real function is to monetise our distress for supposed 'experts' and big chemists. 這是英國的NHS的治療師留的，精神科中槍