johndiii
The Johnny Depp–Amber Heard Trial Is Not as Complica...
In my opinion, this trial is very much a DARVO scenario. Heard is no angel, but she did not defame Depp. He’s using his wealth to continue to abuse her, which is obvious from how she is being attacked.
Skip Z
Yes!
Exacerangutan
(I would argue 100% precisely the opposite based on every once of every experience I have ever had with abused and abusive people)
Exacerangutan
(except that DARVO definitely applies, just in entirely the other direction)
johndiii
Exacerangutan : Well, he lost the Sun case, even though the burden of proof was on the other side. And initiating a defamation case over the sentence “Then two years ago, I became a public figure representing domestic abuse, and I felt the full force of our culture’s wrath for women who speak out.”
johndiii
Exacerangutan : Which is arguably true, whether or not she was telling the truth about the abuse. Given that, it’s hard to avoid the conclusion that the defamation case is nothing more than an attempt to punish her, as he threatened to do. And it’s working.
Exacerangutan
he did lose that case... and from what I gather she's now being considered for perjury charges after lying emphatically and demonstrably about key statements
johndiii
Exacerangutan : From what I can find, there are two instances of perjury charges being considered - one relating to their violation of Australian biosecurity laws when they were still a couple, and the other to her statement that she had donated her divorce settlement money.

I’d be interested to read of any others. Clearly, neither has scruples about lying.
Exacerangutan
sorry running around an airport on too little sleep is not the optimal scenario for this conversation and we're gonna be taking off soon orz so I'll try and jump in again later when I'm able to
johndiii
Exacerangutan : I get that. Recently spent the night in a terminal at Heathrow. Safe travels.
載入新的回覆