((∑[T𝒰]∏A∈T]A≃1
無限自然數製
Martin Escardo on Twitter
((∑[T𝒰]∏A∈T]A≃1
常識跟大腦不夠用QQ
數學家的邏輯到底都怎麼唸的
Martin Escardo on Twitter
"
Martin Escardo
EscardoMartin
Replying to
EscardoMartin
See my paper "Infinite sets that satisfy the principle of omniscience in any variety of constructive mathematics"."
https://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/...
((∑[T𝒰]∏A∈T]A≃1
一直都想搞懂這個到底是怎樣!
Martin Escardo on Twitter
"Martin Escardo EscardoMartin
Replying to EscardoMartin
Just to be clear, here I am not viewing constructive mathematics as computable mathematics in the sense of Turing computability and Kleene realizability.
4/"
((∑[T𝒰]∏A∈T]A≃1
"Martin Escardo EscardoMartin
Replying to EscardoMartin
Constructive mathematics makes sense without knowing about Turing machines or the meta-conjecture that they would capture the intuitive mathematical notion of algorithm, whetever that may be.
5/"
((∑[T𝒰]∏A∈T]A≃1
原來關鍵字是 Bishop 嗎
畢竟 CH 總是很自然要去考慮可計算性
XOO
((∑[T𝒰]∏A∈T]A≃1
喔喔喔太好了感謝推薦!! 只要不是哲學討論就沒問題
XOO
((∑[T𝒰]∏A∈T]A≃1
XOO : 謝謝!! 面對他 接受他 放下它
((∑[T𝒰]∏A∈T]A≃1
ar chi ve . org 是什麼神奇網站
載入新的回覆