data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19628/19628f70b8f9cb450f0be22d091709921681326d" alt=""
saku 🌠
why do medication commercials feel the need lately to tell you not to use it if you're allergic to it
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19628/19628f70b8f9cb450f0be22d091709921681326d" alt=""
saku 🌠
this didn't used to happen, who was stupid enough to do it
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49b8c/49b8c30504c98051fea562690356ec518d5152f9" alt=""
Penta2
It did always happen, but the answer to your precise question is: "Way, way more people than you'd think possible."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49b8c/49b8c30504c98051fea562690356ec518d5152f9" alt=""
Penta2
Because they don't mean the API usually, the actual drug, but instead the inactive ingredients.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19628/19628f70b8f9cb450f0be22d091709921681326d" alt=""
saku 🌠
it uses the name of the drug though?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19628/19628f70b8f9cb450f0be22d091709921681326d" alt=""
saku 🌠
"if you're allergic to [drug], don't take [drug]"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49b8c/49b8c30504c98051fea562690356ec518d5152f9" alt=""
Penta2
Good point. In that case I have NO IDEA. I presume it's because of the inactive ingredients but have no proof.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13957/13957b5e2d624a02cd9911296f36c31b0e9c556e" alt=""
curieosity。
it may be that some take it despite the allergies bc it's still somewhat effective for them
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19628/19628f70b8f9cb450f0be22d091709921681326d" alt=""
saku 🌠
ohh
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13957/13957b5e2d624a02cd9911296f36c31b0e9c556e" alt=""
curieosity。
kinda like "eh, the effectiveness is worth the side effects" but the allergic reactions are something they consider a side effect