data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2daa/e2daa9b09b05dc4ed459870c081c2f1d0531053d" alt=""
LJY
有些軟體完全靠社群跟基金會維護,那大概永遠打不贏商業軟體吧。(望向OOo跟LibreOffice
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2daa/e2daa9b09b05dc4ed459870c081c2f1d0531053d" alt=""
LJY
M$的Office賣那麼貴還是有點道理的
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0750d/0750dc682397cc2ab9d4d8b727fcba3e61fca195" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2daa/e2daa9b09b05dc4ed459870c081c2f1d0531053d" alt=""
LJY
有跟商業軟體一較高下能力的FOSS很多都是有公司在推,有自己的盈利模式
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2daa/e2daa9b09b05dc4ed459870c081c2f1d0531053d" alt=""
LJY
總之來說,要開發軟體 = 要有錢,只靠一堆程式能力變態級的汽油人工程師最後還是成不了大業
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f77a7/f77a709e77577b8427a7f5654719b67ecffa16cd" alt=""
三倍速@冬馬黨中央政治局常委
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e928a/e928aa7a4b68177154bd5bd3c6c5f08717f4ec95" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7977/c797778c12ae73638aed3795ca063305927997ad" alt=""
doomleika
沒有客戶踢屁股做出來的東西不會合乎市場需求
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a486a/a486aa0ebd3a448b5966121ac1e60242f510feed" alt=""
小望老師@想學UE5請找我
這些軟體的目的本來就不是要打擊另一套主流軟體,那是提供另外一種選擇。對免費或開源軟體來說,搶市占率並不會讓他更賺錢啊。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2daa/e2daa9b09b05dc4ed459870c081c2f1d0531053d" alt=""
LJY
所以就比較沒動力在好用跟穩定這上面下功夫啊
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2daa/e2daa9b09b05dc4ed459870c081c2f1d0531053d" alt=""
LJY
OOo以前也曾經是商業軟體
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2daa/e2daa9b09b05dc4ed459870c081c2f1d0531053d" alt=""
LJY
我想我說的「打不贏」不是指市佔率之類的,而是就好用程度跟穩定性這些
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0750d/0750dc682397cc2ab9d4d8b727fcba3e61fca195" alt=""