๐”–๐”ซ๐”ฆ๐”ฅ๐”ฒ๐”ฏรณ๐”ซ๐”จ๐”ž
[gawker] come on now. "Gawker.com is out of business because one wealthy person maliciously set out to destroy it, spending millions of dollars in secret, and succeeded. That is the only reason."
๐”–๐”ซ๐”ฆ๐”ฅ๐”ฒ๐”ฏรณ๐”ซ๐”จ๐”ž
That is patently untrue. That is not the only reason.
๐”–๐”ซ๐”ฆ๐”ฅ๐”ฒ๐”ฏรณ๐”ซ๐”จ๐”ž
You're also out of business because you outed people weho weren't ready, posted sex tapes and generally harrassed people.
Exacerangutan
I feel like gawker's main problem was more likely being gawker...
ฯƒฯั”ัฮฑ gะฝฯƒั•ั‚
there was something about Hulk Hogan, wasn't there?
๐”–๐”ซ๐”ฆ๐”ฅ๐”ฒ๐”ฏรณ๐”ซ๐”จ๐”ž
"It's ok if we do this it's in our model."
Exacerangutan
I mean I think the comment is basically a plaintive version of "they got away with the same shit until they tried doing it to someone rich and angry"
๐”–๐”ซ๐”ฆ๐”ฅ๐”ฒ๐”ฏรณ๐”ซ๐”จ๐”ž
And the wealthy malicious dude? They posted a shit ton of articles years ago speculating on his sexual prefs then outed him.
๐”–๐”ซ๐”ฆ๐”ฅ๐”ฒ๐”ฏรณ๐”ซ๐”จ๐”ž
Exacerangutan :-oh did i link a comment? I meant to link to article.
Exacerangutan
err well I meant the quote sorry
Exacerangutan
comment in the broader sense, not specifically the internet sense :x
๐”–๐”ซ๐”ฆ๐”ฅ๐”ฒ๐”ฏรณ๐”ซ๐”จ๐”ž
Man their site is full of woe today
๐”–๐”ซ๐”ฆ๐”ฅ๐”ฒ๐”ฏรณ๐”ซ๐”จ๐”ž
Which is silly. The resdt oif their sites are fine.
่ผ‰ๅ…ฅๆ–ฐ็š„ๅ›ž่ฆ†