JigmeDatse
Told a friend off earlier. They used a bad word.
Snailquake
what was the bad word?
ॐ andavane
Perhaps it was context specific.
After all, no word in itself is either good or bad.
Arbieroo
^wrong! "Good" is obviously "good" and "bad" is obviously "bad"! ;-)
Snailquake
to know what JigmeDatse considers a bad word, because I'm sure it won't be a swearword. :-D
JigmeDatse
Psychotic
Snailquake
that's an especially vague term with judgemental connotations. Much like "crazy", except that "crazy" can be used in a fond way.
JigmeDatse
Indeed.
Snailquake
sorry the people around you are being such horrible bastards.
Arbieroo
BlueHawK: ah! But I'm not talking about what they mean! ;-)
JigmeDatse
This was someone I've called my best friend referring to themselves.
Snailquake
ah. Did they listen?
JigmeDatse
Not sure.
JessicaKoala
we've heard from friend. They agreed with what JigmeDatse said.
Snailquake
:-)
ॐ andavane
is "neurotic" OK?
JigmeDatse
Can't think of how it would be.
JigmeDatse
Perhaps you are thonking of the classification of mental disorders as either psychotic or neurotic?
JigmeDatse
Believes strongly that 'mental disorders' do not really exist. Especially as 'biological' entities
JigmeDatse
If it's biplogical, it can be tested for biologically. If it can be tested for biologically, sundenly it moves from mental disorder, to neurological disorder.
JigmeDatse
In no other field of medicine, does what you're treating quit beong in your field, when you can objectively test for it.
Snailquake
mostly in agreement, except inamusch as a lot of conditions are not yet understood well enough to be tested for,
Snailquake
and on top of that, neither neuroscience nor medical testing are yet advanced enough to test for most neurological issues.
JigmeDatse
True, but in terms of psychiatry, there is not really any attempt to look at ways to test, as providing one takes it out of their pervue.
載入新的回覆