ugly androgyne
[FB] So there was an incident recently locally with a police officer busting out a window and tazing a man because he refused to exit the vehicle during a traffic stop.
ugly androgyne
People are crying "but fourth amendment!!"
ugly androgyne
And sorry to say, there's a Supreme Court backed precedent to actually having to exit the vehicle when an officer requests you to. you can lock the car behind you if you want
ugly androgyne
And no, busting the glass and tazing wasn't exactly rational either, especially with kids in the back seat
ugly androgyne
I commented thusly to someone (with a link to a wiki article on the case) on FB and they're all "Well the constitution has been around longer so I'm gonna go by that"
ugly androgyne
.... yeah who needs facts, right?
Rᴀɪɴᴇs
ψ Jк Aѕunvαh ☀
Um because that's what the supreme court is for. Interpreting constitutional law.
ψ Jк Aѕunvαh ☀
unless it's totes different to the equivalent here.
ʟᴀᴅy ɪɴqᴜɪꜱɪᴛᴏʀ
nah that's definitely what the Supreme Court is for in the US too.
ʟᴀᴅy ɪɴqᴜɪꜱɪᴛᴏʀ
it's just that when Supreme Court judges make a decision that some people don't like, they get mad and try to accuse the judges of going against the spirit of the Constitution.
ψ Jк Aѕunvαh ☀
Yeah that happens with the High Court here.
ʟᴀᴅy ɪɴqᴜɪꜱɪᴛᴏʀ
re: this officer, yeah he definitely overreacted for sure, but the dude should have gotten out of his car. full stop.
Gavitron
Yeah, he should have, but... man, the Supreme Court has indeed screwed up many times before. Still, if a cop asks you to get out, you do it.
Gavitron
But... that was some overreacting on the cops' part, too.
Gavitron
And I can see why he didn't feel safe doing so, if they reacted that way.
ugly androgyne
I don''t like the ruling, but knowing your rights in interactions with police is important.
載入新的回覆